The Indian Buffet Process defines a distribution on binary matrices with a finite number of rows (e.g. objects) and an infinite number of columns (e.g. features).
The procedure below is shown for illustration only — it deliberately does not halt, so it is rendered as static code rather than a runnable box.
From Ref:roy2008stochastic:
(define (ibp-stick-breaking-process concentration base-measure)
(let ((sticks (mem (lambda (j) (random-beta 1.0 concentration))))
(atoms (mem (lambda (j) (base-measure)))))
(lambda ()
(let loop ((j 1) (dualstick (sticks 1)))
(append (if (flip dualstick) ;; with prob. dualstick
(atoms j) ;; add feature j
'()) ;; otherwise, next stick
(loop (+ j 1) (* dualstick (sticks (+ j 1)))))))))
This procedure does not halt, and therefore does not induce a well-defined distribution on values, although the original IBP does. This raises the question of whether the IBP has a computable de Finetti representation and may have implications for sampler design.
Contrast this with the Pitman-Yor Process, whose stick-breaking weights sum to one almost surely, so its sampler does halt with probability one.
See also:
References: